{{t(...c.sub)}}
{{t(c.en,c.zh)}}
{{t('What do you see?','你看见什么？')}}
{{t(...c.see)}}
{{t('CULTURE · RESEARCH · CONNECTION','文化 · 研究 · 联结')}}
{{t('Does being seen','被看见，')}}
{{t('mean being','是否意味着')}}
{{t('understood?','被理解？')}}
{{t('Beyond the red lanterns, there are stories of home, belonging and beginning again. Discover the Spring Festival through the people and meanings behind its symbols.','红灯笼之外，还有关于家、归属与重新出发的故事。从符号出发，走近春节背后的人与意义。')}}
{{t('From seeing the Spring Festival to understanding it.','从看见春节，到理解春节。')}}
{{t('A question grounded','从实证研究')}}
{{t('in real research.','出发的问题。')}}
66{{t('UK media reports','英国媒体报道')}}{{t('12 mainstream outlets','涉及12家主流媒体')}}
204{{t('valid survey responses','有效受众问卷')}}{{t('UK-based adults','英国成年受众')}}
195{{t('matched responses','媒体—受众匹配样本')}}{{t('outlet-level matching','基于媒体机构层面匹配')}}
{{t('THE IDEA AT THE HEART OF THIS PROJECT','项目的核心命题')}}
{{t('Visibility is a beginning.','可见，是起点。')}}
{{t('Understanding takes a little more.','理解，需要再走近一些。')}}
{{t('Our research finds a festival that is widely appreciated for its appearance, yet less closely connected to people’s everyday lives. This site turns that question into an invitation to look, ask and connect.','研究呈现了一种“欣赏性疏离”：受众喜爱春节的视觉文化，却较少建立个人情感联系。我们把这一问题转化为看见、询问与联结的邀请。')}}
01 / {{t('SEE','看见')}}
{{t('Start with a symbol','从一个符号开始')}}
{{t('A lantern. A dumpling. A greeting.','一盏灯、一只饺子、一句拜年话。')}}
↗02 / {{t('UNDERSTAND','理解')}}{{t('Look beneath the surface','看见表象之下')}}
{{t('What media show, and what audiences know.','媒体呈现了什么，受众理解了什么。')}}
↗03 / {{t('CONNECT','联结')}}{{t('Find something in common','寻找情感的共鸣')}}
{{t('Make room for a conversation.','为一次真实的交流留出空间。')}}
↗{{t('An editorial pathway for this website; its effects have not been tested as a research intervention.','这是网站设计的内容路径，尚未经传播干预效果验证。')}}
{{t('A meaningful celebration','有意义的庆祝，')}}
{{t('needs thoughtful preparation.','也需要周到的准备。')}}
{{t('Build a live, scenario-specific list of checks for a UK event, with reasons and official sources.','根据英国活动条件实时生成核查清单，查看触发原因与官方依据。')}}
{{t('Open the organiser toolkit','打开活动组织工具')}} ↗01 / {{t('BEYOND THE SYMBOLS','走进符号背后')}}
{{t('Every symbol','每个符号，')}}
{{t('has a human story.','都有人情的故事。')}}
{{t('Begin with what you see. Then explore what it means, why it matters, and where it might meet your own experience.','从眼前所见开始，探索它的意义、它的重要性，以及它与你自身经验的连接。')}}
{{t('Customs vary by region, household and generation. These are invitations to conversation, not a rulebook for every family.','习俗因地域、家庭和代际而不同。这是交流的邀请，而非适用于每个家庭的规则。')}}
{{t('Cultural context: UNESCO’s 2024 heritage entry. The six interpretive stories are newly written public-facing content, informed by the project’s distinction between visible symbols and deeper meanings. They were not tested in the original study.','文化背景参照联合国教科文组织2024年非遗条目。六组解释性内容为本次新增转化，回应研究中表层符号与深层意义的区分，未经原研究效果验证。')}} UNESCO ↗
{{t('Continue the conversation','把理解带入交流')}} →02 / {{t('WHAT OUR RESEARCH FOUND','研究发现')}}
{{t('Appreciated.','被欣赏。')}}
{{t('But not always understood.','却未必被理解。')}}
{{t('A study of UK mainstream media and audience responses in the post-UNESCO inscription context. Media sampled December 2024–March 2026; inscription is a time and institutional context, not a proven cause.','春节申遗后语境中的英国主流媒体与受众研究。报道采样期为2024年12月至2026年3月；申遗是时间和制度背景，不是已证实的效果原因。')}}
01 / {{t('MEDIA CONTENT','媒体内容')}}
{{t('What makes the news?','什么进入报道？')}}
{{t('Share of reports by primary theme · N = 66','按报道主主题分类的比例 · N = 66')}}
{{t('Each report has one primary theme. All five categories are shown. Source: paper, Table 4, pp. 15–16.','每篇报道对应一个主要主题，展示全部五类。出处：论文表4，第15—16页。')}}
02 / {{t('INTERPRETIVE DEPTH','解释深度')}}
{{t('The symbols lead.','符号走在前面。')}}
{{t('Symbolic presentation · N = 66 reports','文化符号呈现类型 · N = 66篇报道')}}
{{t('Mutually exclusive categories, rounded to one decimal place. “Deep only” excludes reports combining surface and deep meanings. Source: Table 4.','各类别互斥，百分比保留一位小数。“仅深层”不含同时呈现表层与深层的报道。出处：表4。')}}
03 / {{t('REPORTING TONE','报道基调')}}
{{t('Mostly neutral, often positive.','多为中性，也常友好。')}}
{{t('Tone is a separate coding dimension from theme and symbolic depth. N = 66; Table 4.','基调是独立于主题和符号深度的编码维度。N = 66；表4。')}}
{{r.v}}%{{t(...r.label)}} · {{r.n}}/66
04 / {{t('AUDIENCE RESPONSES','受众回应')}}
{{t('Liking is not the same as connection.','喜爱，不等于情感连接。')}}
{{t('N = 204 UK-based respondents · selected individual items, not composite scores','N = 204名英国受众 · 展示选定单题均值，不是维度总分')}}
{{t(...r.dimension)}}
{{t(...r.label)}}
{{r.v.toFixed(2)}} / 5{{t(...r.desc)}}
{{t('Five-point agreement items (1–5). Separate affect, cognition and behavioural-intention items are labelled individually; they do not form a common measure of “communication success”. Source: Table 5, pp. 17–19.','五点同意量表（1—5）。情感、认知和行为意愿题项分别标明，不能合成统一的“传播成效”指标。出处：表5，第17—19页。')}}
05 / {{t('MEDIA–AUDIENCE MATCHING','媒体—受众匹配')}}
ΔR² = .073
{{t('A limited, statistically significant addition to the cognition model.','对文化认知模型有限、但具有统计意义的额外解释力。')}}
{{t('In 195 matched responses, adding media discourse features after age, gender and education increased explained variance in cognition by 7.3 percentage points (p < .01). Total R² = .079. This is not a 7.3% improvement in anyone’s understanding.','在195份匹配样本中，控制年龄、性别和教育后，加入媒体话语特征使认知模型的解释方差增加7.3个百分点（p < .01），总R² = .079。这并非个人理解提高7.3%。')}}
{{t('More positive outlet-level tone was associated with lower cognition scores (β = −.296, p < .01). The study cannot establish that positive reporting reduces knowledge. Media blocks for affect and behavioural intention were not statistically significant overall.','媒体机构层面更正面的基调与较低认知得分相关（β = −.296，p < .01），不能据此断言正面报道降低知识。情感与行为意愿模型中媒体变量块的总体增量不显著。')}}
{{t('Source: Table 7, pp. 20–21. Exposure is self-reported; matching is at outlet level.','出处：表7，第20—21页。媒体接触为自报，匹配在媒体机构层面进行。')}}{{t('Read the findings with their limits.','在研究边界内理解发现。')}}
{{t('The survey was recruited through Prolific; most respondents had limited Chinese cultural background. The study is cross-sectional, uses self-reported exposure and does not represent all UK audiences. Outlet-level matching cannot establish what each respondent read. Social media and independent creators were outside the media corpus.','问卷通过Prolific招募，多数受访者中国文化背景有限。研究为横截面设计，采用自报媒体接触，不能代表全部英国受众。机构层面匹配不能确定每个人实际读了哪些文章；社交媒体和独立创作者未纳入媒体样本。')}}
{{paperTitle}} · {{t('Research manuscript supplied by the project lead; Tables 4, 5 and 7 verified against the supplied PDF.','数据已对照项目负责人提供的论文PDF表4、表5和表7核验。')}}
{{t('Methods & project team','研究方法与团队')}} →03 / {{t('JOIN THE CELEBRATION','理解与参与')}}
{{t('Come with curiosity.','带着好奇走近。')}}
{{t('Leave with a connection.','带着联结离开。')}}
{{t('You do not need to know every custom to take part. A thoughtful question and a willingness to listen are a good place to begin.','不必熟悉每种习俗才可以参与。一个真诚的问题与倾听的意愿，就是很好的开始。')}}
{{t('SOMETHING TO SAY','一句祝福')}}
新年快乐
Happy New Year
{{t('A warm, simple greeting. You can say it in English too; the care behind it matters.','温暖而简单的祝愿。用英语说也很好，重要的是其中的心意。')}}
{{copyMessage}}
{{t('From visitor to participant','从观看到参与')}}
- {{t('Find a local celebration.','寻找当地庆祝活动。')}}
{{t('Check your council, library, museum or local community organisation. Confirm the current date, accessibility, tickets and transport with the organiser.','可查看地方政府、图书馆、博物馆或当地社团信息。向组织者确认日期、无障碍安排、票务与交通。')}}
- {{t('Ask about one detail.','询问一个细节。')}}
{{t('“What does this mean to your family?” opens a different conversation from “What is this called?” Ask permission before photographing people.','“这对你们家意味着什么？”与“这叫什么？”会开启不同的交流。拍摄他人前请先征得同意。')}}
- {{t('Make space for your own story.','也分享你的故事。')}}
{{t('Share a tradition of welcoming, remembering or beginning again. A point of connection does not mean two traditions are identical.','分享你关于迎接、纪念或重新开始的习惯。产生共鸣不意味着两种传统完全相同。')}}
{{t('PAUSE & EXPLORE','停一停，想一想')}}
{{t('A little context changes the picture.','多一点语境，看见不同。')}}
{{t('Three questions with explanations. Answers stay on this device during this visit; this is a learning activity, not a research survey or a measure of impact.','三个带有解释反馈的问题。答案仅保留在本次访问中；这是学习互动，不是研究问卷，也不用于测量传播效果。')}}
{{answers[i]===q.correct?t('That’s right. ','答对了。'):t('A different way to think about it: ','换个角度想想：')}}{{t(...q.feedback)}}
{{t('COMMON QUESTIONS','常见问题')}}
{{t('It is okay to ask.','可以从提问开始。')}}
{{t(...f.q)}} ＋
{{t(...f.a)}}
04 / {{t('ORGANISER TOOLKIT','活动组织辅助')}}
{{t('Plan with care.','周到筹划。')}}
{{t('Celebrate with meaning.','让庆祝更有意义。')}}
{{t('A live list of checks for your UK event. Change any option to update it immediately. Every item explains why it appears.','英国活动核查辅助清单。更改选项即刻更新，每项均说明触发原因。')}}
{{t('Student research and information support, not legal advice or event approval. Verify requirements with the local authority. Guidance reviewed 27 October 2026.','学生研究与信息辅助工具，不构成法律意见或活动审批。具体要求须向当地主管部门核实。指引核查日期：2026年10月27日。')}}
{{t('YOUR CHECKLIST','当前核查清单')}}
{{tasks.length}} {{t('checks to consider','项待核查事项')}}
{{doneCount}} / {{tasks.length}} {{t('marked complete','项标记完成')}}
{{t('Why: ','原因：')}}{{t(...task.why)}}
{{source(task.source).name}} ↗{{t('An unchecked condition does not prove that no other duties apply. This tool flags selected topics; it cannot assess every legal or site-specific requirement.','未触发某一事项不意味着不存在其他义务。本工具提示选定主题，无法评估全部法律或场地要求。')}}
{{t('WORDS THAT HELP YOU PLAN','理解组织活动的术语')}}
{{t('A plain-language glossary.','读得懂的术语。')}}
{{t('No matching terms. Try another word or category.','未找到匹配术语，请尝试其他关键词或类别。')}}
{{t(g.en,g.zh)}}
{{t(g.zh,g.en)}}{{t(...g.def)}}
{{t('Official guidance','官方指引')}} ↗{{t('USEFUL STARTING POINTS','实用起点')}}
{{t('Prepare the paperwork.','把准备落到纸上。')}}
{{t('Editable reference templates, not approved forms. Adapt them to your activity and local requirements.','可编辑参考模板，并非官方批准表格。请按实际活动与地方要求调整。')}}
{{t('Go to the source.','查阅官方依据。')}}
05 / {{t('ABOUT THE PROJECT','关于研究')}}
{{t('Research into meaning.','研究文化意义。')}}
{{t('An invitation to connect.','让理解走向联结。')}}
{{t('An undergraduate research project at the School of English and International Studies, Beijing Foreign Studies University.','北京外国语大学英语学院本科生创新研究项目。')}}
{{t('THE RESEARCH','项目研究')}}
“春节申遗”后的国际认同构建：英国主流媒体对春节叙事的话语重构与中国的柔性传播策略
{{t('Project S202510030006 · Beijing municipal undergraduate innovation and entrepreneurship training programme. The research links quantitative media content analysis, a UK audience survey and outlet-level matching to examine visibility and perceptual distance.','项目编号S202510030006 · 北京市级大学生创新创业训练计划项目。结合媒体量化内容分析、英国受众问卷及机构层面匹配，考察文化可见性与感知距离。')}}
{{t('Faculty supervisor: 齐皓. Completion certificate dated 30 June 2026; forum award and presentation certificates dated 31 May 2026. The award title is 《被看见的春节——英国主流媒体中的中国春节建构及其受众接受研究》.','指导教师：齐皓。结项证明日期为2026年6月30日，论坛获奖及宣读证明日期为2026年5月31日。获奖材料中的论文题名为《被看见的春节——英国主流媒体中的中国春节建构及其受众接受研究》。')}}
✧ {{t('Excellent project completion','优秀结项')}}✧ {{t('First Prize · BFSU 2nd Undergraduate Academic Innovation Forum','北外第二届本科生学术创新论坛一等奖')}}✧ {{t('Paper presented at the main forum','论文于主论坛公开宣读')}}
{{t('PAPER · SUMMARY','核心论文 · 摘要转述')}}
{{paperTitle}}
{{t('The study examines 66 reports from 12 UK mainstream outlets and 204 audience responses. It finds that celebratory, visually recognisable representation can coexist with limited cultural knowledge and personal connection. Media discourse adds limited explanatory power to cognition in 195 matched responses. The findings support more contextualised storytelling while remaining correlational. UNESCO inscription provides the time and institutional context.','研究考察12家英国主流媒体的66篇报道与204份受众问卷。结果显示，节庆性、可辨识的视觉呈现可与有限的文化知识和个人连接并存；在195份匹配样本中，媒体话语对认知提供有限的额外解释力。研究启发更具语境的叙事，但统计关系仍属关联。申遗仅提供时间与制度背景。')}}
{{t('Source: supplied research manuscript, abstract; §§3–6 and Tables 4, 5, 7. This is a plain-language summary, not an additional study.','依据：所提供论文摘要、第3—6节及表4、表5、表7。此为通俗摘要，不是新增研究。')}}
{{t('PEOPLE & CONTRIBUTIONS','团队与贡献')}}
{{m[0]}}
{{t(m[1],m[2])}}
{{t('Names and research roles verified against the project completion report, §III. Personal contact details and student numbers are not published.','姓名与研究分工依据结项报告第三部分核对。')}}
{{t('Development reference: cg-always/ckx_project and the original Netlify guide. The upstream author’s identity is credited by their public handle. This edition retains the Vue approach and functional organisation; custom components and corrected rules are newly implemented. Upstream custom code is not redistributed because no explicit reuse licence was found.','开发参考：cg-always/ckx_project及原Netlify指南，按公开账号保留协作者出处。本版沿用Vue技术路线与功能组织，自定义组件和修正规则为新增实现；原仓库未发现明确许可，因此未再分发其自定义代码。')}} GitHub ↗
{{t('Website integration, original vector illustrations and bilingual editorial drafting assisted by Codex. Academic research contributions remain those of the team above.','网站整合、原创矢量插画与双语内容初稿由Codex辅助完成；学术研究贡献归属于上述项目团队。')}}